Journal
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue 3, Pages 563-570Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04094-5
Keywords
Intracranial germ cell tumor; Epidemiology; Japanese
Categories
Funding
- Markoff Art in Giving Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study evaluated the incidence of pediatric intra-cranial germ cell tumors (iGCTs) in Japanese immigrant populations compared to the native Japanese population. The results showed that the incidence in immigrant populations was not as high as in the native population, suggesting that genetic predisposition may not be the cause of the increased incidence in Japan.
Background Pediatric intra-cranial germ cell tumors (iGCTs) occur at an incidence of 0.6-1.2 cases/million/year in Western countries. The incidence is reported up to 5 times higher in Japan. It is unknown whether this increased incidence is due to genetic predisposition or environment. Methods The incidence of iGCTs in children ages 0-19 years was evaluated from December 1st, 1996-December 1st, 2016 in stable Japanese immigrant populations living abroad and compared to current native Japanese registry data. The incidence of medullobblastoma was used as a control to account for assumptions in the data. Sites were identified based on historical and population data of known large scale emigration from Japan during a period of industrialization from 1868-1912 which resulted in large, stable Japanese immigrant populations abroad. These three representative sites included Lima, Peru, San Paolo, Brazil, and Vancouver, Canada. Data was collected from registry and hospital-based resources within each region. Results A review of the Brain Tumor Registry of Japan from 1984-2004 revealed an incidence of 2.5 cases/million/year, lower than previously reported, and a lower incidence of medulloblastoma at 1.2 cases/million/year. Data from Vancouver, Canada, Lima, Peru, and San Paolo, Brazil included a total population of 731,174 Japanese persons. The ratio of all medulloblastoma to iGCT cases in Japan was identified as 1:2 while the ratio was 2:1, 6.5:1, and 5:1, respectively, in the other three locations. The data suggests increased incidence in native Japan may not translate to higher incidence in immigrant Japanese populations abroad and a clear genetic component was not found in our data set. Conclusions A more precise and comprehensive study is needed to determine the cause of this difference in incidence. This study also emphasizes the importance of national and state registries and is a call to collaborate on state and country level epidemiology studies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available