4.4 Article

Digital Droplet PCR Is a Reliable Tool to Improve Minimal Residual Disease Stratification in Adult Philadelphia-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 893-900

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.04.014

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Special5x1000 ProgramsMetastatic Disease: The Key Unmet Need in Oncology [21198]
  2. Progetti di Rilevante InteresseNazionale Italia [2017PPS2X4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared RQ-PCR and ddPCR analysis of 116 samples from 44 acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients, confirming the advantages of ddPCR in disease level quantification and improving patient risk stratification.
Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) is an implementation of conventional PCR, with the potential of overcoming some limitations of real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). To evaluate if ddPCR may improve the quan-tification of disease levels and refine patients' risk stratification, 116 samples at four time points from 44 (35 B-lineage and 9 T-lineage) adult Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients enrolled in the GIMEMA LAL1913 protocol were analyzed by RQ-PCR and ddPCR. A concordance rate between RQ-PCR and ddPCR of 79% (P < 0.0001) was observed; discordances were identified in 21% of samples, with the majority being RQ-PCR-negative (NEG) or positive not quantifiable (PNQ). ddPCR significantly reduced the proportion of PNQ samplesd2.6% versus 14% (P Z 0.003)dand allowed disease quantifiability in 6.6% of RQ-PCR-NEG, increasing minimal residual disease quantification in 14% of samples. Forty-seven samples were also investigated by next-generation sequencing, which confirmed the ddPCR results in samples classified as RQ-PCR-PNQ or NEG. By reclassifying samples on the basis of the ddPCR results, a better event-free survival stratification of patients was observed compared to RQ-PCR; indeed, ddPCR captured more true-quantifiable samples, with five relapses occurring in three pa-tients who resulted RQ-PCR-PNQ/NEG but proved ddPCR positive quantifiable. At variance, no relapses were recorded in patients whose follow-up samples were RQ-PCR-PNQ but reclassified as ddPCR-NEG. A broader application of ddPCR in acute lymphoblastic leukemia clinical trials will help to improve patients' stratification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available