4.6 Article

Curvature constraints from large scale structure

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/013

Keywords

cosmological parameters from LSS; power spectrum; redshift surveys

Funding

  1. ERC Starting Grant cosmoIGM
  2. INFN/PD51 INDARK grant
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation
  4. NSF [0244990]
  5. NASA [NNX15AB18G]
  6. John Templeton Foundation
  7. Simons Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We modified the CLASS code in order to include relativistic galaxy number counts in spatially curved geometries; we present the formalism and study the effect of relativistic corrections on spatial curvature. The new version of the code is now publicly available. Using a Fisher matrix analysis, we investigate how measurements of the spatial curvature parameter Omega(K) with future galaxy surveys are affected by relativistic effects, which influence observations of the large scale galaxy distribution. These effects include contributions from cosmic magnification, Doppler terms and terms involving the gravitational potential. As an application, we consider angle and redshift dependent power spectra, which are especially well suited for model independent cosmological constraints. We compute our results for a representative deep, wide and spectroscopic survey, and our results show the impact of relativistic corrections on spatial curvature parameter estimation. We show that constraints on the curvature parameter may be strongly biased if, in particular, cosmic magnification is not included in the analysis. Other relativistic effects turn out to be subdominant in the studied configuration. We analyze how the shift in the estimated best-fit value for the curvature and other cosmological parameters depends on the magnification bias parameter, and find that significant biases are to be expected if this term is not properly considered in the analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available