4.7 Article

N-Arylimidazoliums as Highly Selective Biomimetic Antimicrobial Agents

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 65, Issue 16, Pages 11309-11321

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00818

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32171364]
  2. National 111 Project of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B16033]
  3. Scientific Fund of Sichuan Province [21YYJC0697]
  4. Sichuan Science and Technology Major Project [2018SZDZX0011, 2018SZDZX0012]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering [sklpme2018-3-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibiotic resistance is a major global health threat. This study presents a charge-dispersed dimerization strategy to enhance the selectivity between prokaryotic microbes and eukaryotic cells for antimicrobial peptide mimics.
Antibiotic resistance has become one of the greatest health threats in the world. In this study, a charge-dispersed dimerization strategy is described for the antimicrobial peptide (AMP) mimics via a tunable cationic charge to improve the selectivity between prokaryotic microbes and eukaryotic cells. This strategy is demonstrated with a series of charge-dispersed AMP mimics based on N-arylimidazolium skeletons. These N-arylimidazolium AMP mimics show potent antibacterial activity against strains along with a low rate of drug resistance, good hemocompatibility, and low cytotoxicity. In addition to the elimination of planktonic bacteria, N-arylimidazolium AMP mimics can also inhibit biofilm formation and destroy the established biofilm. More importantly, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-induced lung-infected mice can be effectively treated by the intravenous administration of N-arylimidazolium AMP mimic, which enable the design of N-arylimidazolium AMP mimics to offer an alternative avenue to eradicate drug-resistant bacterial infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available