4.7 Article

Conformational Effects on the Passive Membrane Permeability of Synthetic Macrocycles

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 65, Issue 15, Pages 10300-10317

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02090

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study measured the passive permeability of 3600 diverse macrocyclic compounds and used machine learning to analyze the results. It found that models incorporating selected properties based on the three-dimensional conformation could predict permeability with a high accuracy. The biased spatial distribution of polar versus nonpolar regions was found to be important for good permeability. Additionally, the study examined the effects of substructural elements on permeability, providing insights for designing macrocycles with high membrane permeability.
Macrocyclic compounds (MCs) can have complex conformational properties that affect pharmacologically important behaviors such as membrane permeability. We measured the passive permeability of 3600 diverse nonpeptidic MCs and used machine learning to analyze the results. Incorporating selected properties based on the three-dimensional (3D) conformation gave models that predicted permeability with Q(2) = 0.81. A biased spatial distribution of polar versus nonpolar regions was particularly important for good permeability, consistent with a mechanism in which the initial insertion of nonpolar portions of a MC helps facilitate the subsequent membrane entry of more polar parts. We also examined effects on permeability of 800 substructural elements by comparing matched molecular pairs. Some substitutions were invariably beneficial or invariably deleterious to permeability, while the influence of others was highly contextual. Overall, the work provides insights into how the permeability of MCs is influenced by their 3D conformational properties and suggests design hypotheses for achieving macrocycles with high membrane permeability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available