4.7 Review

The Effects of Nonclinician Guidance on Effectiveness and Process Outcomes in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Psychiatry

Current directions in digital interventions for mood and anxiety disorders

Tanvi Lakhtakia et al.

Summary: This review provides an overview of the current scope of digital interventions for anxiety and mood disorders, specifically focusing on smartphone apps. The findings suggest that guided digital interventions have shown effectiveness in improving anxiety and mood symptoms, while unguided interventions also have potential. However, further comparisons with existing treatments are necessary to understand their actual efficacy.

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY (2022)

Review Psychiatry

The emergence of digital mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: A review of recent advances and implications for the treatment and prevention of mental disorders

Helena Carter et al.

Summary: This review assesses the scientific evidence of digital mental health interventions in LMICs, finding that most studies involved online interventions with positive feasibility and acceptability effects, especially for depression and mood disorders.

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH (2021)

Article Health Policy & Services

Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment

David C. Mohr et al.

Summary: Accessibility is a major obstacle to mental health treatment for many Americans, as there is a shortage of mental health providers in the United States. While digital mental health treatments (DMHTs) are effective interventions for common mental disorders, they have not been widely adopted. Experts recommend offering guided DMHTs to all patients with common mental disorders, making DMHT products and services reimbursable to facilitate integration into the U.S. health care landscape.

PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES (2021)

Review Psychiatry

New Evidence in the Booming Field of Online Mindfulness: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Marion Sommers-Spijkerman et al.

Summary: The study demonstrates that online mindfulness-based interventions have significant effects on depression, anxiety, stress, and mindfulness, with smaller effects on well-being. Online MBIs show higher efficacy on stress when provided with guidance and are particularly effective for populations with psychological symptoms regarding anxiety.

JMIR MENTAL HEALTH (2021)

Review Psychology, Clinical

Attrition and Adherence in Smartphone-Delivered Interventions for Mental Health Problems: A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review

Jake Linardon et al.

JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2020)

Review Psychiatry

Internet interventions for mental health in university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mathias Harrer et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH (2019)

Article Psychiatry

How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial

Sara Balduzzi et al.

EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH (2019)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for major depressive disorder: A randomized controlled trial

Isabelle M. Rosso et al.

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY (2017)

Article Psychiatry

Pre-post effect sizes should be avoided in meta-analyses

P. Cuijpers et al.

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES (2017)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Clarifying the Concept of Adherence to eHealth Technology: Systematic Review on When Usage Becomes Adherence

Floor Sieverink et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2017)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Meta-Analysis of Odds Ratios Current Good Practices

Bei-Hung Chang et al.

MEDICAL CARE (2017)

Review Psychiatry

The WPA-Lancet Psychiatry Commission on the Future of Psychiatry

Dinesh Bhugra et al.

LANCET PSYCHIATRY (2017)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Web-Based and Mobile Stress Management Intervention for Employees: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Elena Heber et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2016)

Review Health Policy & Services

E-Mental Health: A Rapid Review of the Literature

Shalini Lal et al.

PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES (2014)

Article Psychology, Clinical

mHealth: A Mechanism to Deliver More Accessible, More Effective Mental Health Care

Matthew Price et al.

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY (2014)

Review Clinical Neurology

Internet-based psychological treatments for depression

Robert Johansson et al.

EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS (2012)

Review Psychology, Clinical

Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Derek Richards et al.

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW (2012)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Supportive Accountability: A Model for Providing Human Support to Enhance Adherence to eHealth Interventions

David C. Mohr et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2011)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Julian P. T. Higgins et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package

Wolfgang Viechtbauer

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2010)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression: Systematic Review

Helen Christensen et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2009)

Article Psychology, Applied

Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs

Scott B. Morris

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2008)

Article Communication

Soldier Attitudes about Technology-Based Approaches to Mental Health Care

Jaime A. B. Wilson et al.

CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR (2008)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial

H Christensen et al.

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2004)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

JPT Higgins et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2003)