4.3 Article

Detection of Wolbachia in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in the State of Maranhao, Brazil

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 1831-1836

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjac092

Keywords

endosymbiont; natural infection; arasite; biological vector; Wolbachia

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico do Maranhao (FAPEMA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the natural infection rate of Wolbachia in Culicidae species in Maranhao, Brazil. Out of 448 mosquitoes analyzed, Wolbachia DNA was detected in 7 species. The study provides important knowledge about the prevalence of Wolbachia in the culicid fauna.
Recently, the endobacteria Wolbachia has emerged as a biological tool for the control of arboviruses. Thus, we investigated the rate of natural infection by Wolbachia in Culicidae species from Maranhao, Brazil. For this, we amplified the Wolbachia surface protein gene (wsp) from mosquitoes collected in six localities of Maranhao, and positive samples were subjected to new analysis using group-specific primers. In total, 448 specimens comprising 6 genera and 18 species of mosquitoes were analyzed. Wolbachia DNA was PCR-detected in 7 species, three of which are new records: Aedes scapularis (Rondani, 1848), Coquillettidia juxtamansonia (Chagas, 1907) and Cq. venezuelensis (Theobald, 1912), in addition to Ae. albopictus (Skuse, 1894) and Culex quinquefasciatus Say, 1823, which are commonly described as permissive to maintain this bacterium in natural environments, and two species of the subgenera Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) Blanchard, 1902 and Culex (Melanoconion) Theobald, 1903 which could not be identified at species level. The infection rate of all species ranged from 0 to 80%, and the average value was 16.5%. This study increases the knowledge about the prevalence of Wolbachia in the culicid fauna and may help in selecting strains for biological control purposes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available