4.2 Article

Biomechanical Analysis of the External Fixation in a Lumbar Fracture Model: A Finite Element Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 469-478

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40846-022-00727-2

Keywords

External fixation; Finite element analysis; Lumbar fracture; Biomechanics

Funding

  1. Clinical Medical Technology Innovation Guidance Project of Hunan Province [2020SK51807]
  2. Key Laboratory in Hengyang City [2018KJ115]
  3. project of health commission in Hunan Province [20201961]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the biomechanical characteristics of external spinal fixation and internal fixation system for treating lumbar fracture through finite element analysis. The results showed that the external fixation system had a better stress distribution and overall mobility compared to the internal fixation system.
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of the external spinal fixation for treating lumbar fracture through finite element analysis (FEA) and provide a theoretical basis for its further application. Methods Two different models of L3 fracture fixed with the external spinal fixation and the internal fixation system respectively were constructed. The ROM, maximum stresses at L3, and the screws of the two models were measured under load control. Subsequently, the applied torque, the maximum stressed at L3, L1/2, L2/3, L3/4, L4/5 discs and the screws were analyzed under displacement control. Results Under load control, the external fixation model reserved more ROM than the internal fixation model (40.4-48.0% vs 30.5-41.0%). Compared to the internal fixation model, the maximum stresses at L3 and screws in the external fixation model were increased. Under displacement control, the external fixation model required fewer moments (N center dot mm) than the internal fixation model (flexion: 7500 vs 12,294; extension: 7500 vs 9027). Further, the maximum stresses at L3 and the screws in the external fixation model were greater than those of the internal fixation model, while the maximum stresses at the upper and lower adjacent discs of fixed segments were less than the internal fixation model. Conclusion Compared to the internal fixation system, the external fixation has a better stress distribution with the greater overall mobility. It theoretically reduces the stress concentration of the adjacent discs and the stress shielding of the fractured vertebral body.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available