4.6 Article

Microstructure and microwave dielectric properties of Ba(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-MgO composite ceramics with nano-silica added

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN ELECTRONICS
Volume 33, Issue 25, Pages 20185-20193

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-022-08837-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52102089]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province [2020C0112, 2021C01092]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ba(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O-3-MgO composite ceramics were prepared by solid-phase method, and the effect of adding different amounts of nano-silica on their properties was studied. The results showed that adding a proper amount of MgO could significantly decrease the permittivity of the ceramics, while adding nano-silica greatly improved the Q x f values of the samples.
Ba(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O-3-MgO composite ceramics were prepared by solid-phase method. The ceramic exhibited the 1:2 ordered structure. By adding a proper amount of MgO, the permittivity decreased rapidly compared with other Ba(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O-3-based ceramics. The Q x f values of the samples were greatly improved by nano-silica. Raman spectra showed that the permittivity and Q x f value showed a strong correlation with Raman shift and full width at half maximum of the A(1g)(O) phonon mode, respectively. The Raman shift of A(1g)(O) was consistent with the variation trend of permittivity. And the full width at half maximum of the A(1g)(O) phonon mode had a negative correlation with the Q x f value. The results showed that upon adding 1.5 wt% nano-silica to the ceramics, the ceramics sintered at 1550 degrees C for 5 h had the lowest Raman shift and the narrowest full width at half maximum, achieving the best microwave dielectric properties: epsilon(r) = 22.22, Q x f = 80,436 GHz, tau(f) = - 5.89 ppm/degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available