4.6 Article

Finding Horndeski theories with Einstein gravity limits

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/11/006

Keywords

modified gravity; gravity

Funding

  1. SNSF Advanced Postdoc. Mobility Fellowship [161058]
  2. STFC Consolidated Grant for Astronomy and Astrophysics at the University of Edinburgh
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [1526225] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Horndeski action is the most general scalar-tensor theory with at most secondorder derivatives in the equations of motion, thus evading Ostrogradsky instabilities and making it of interest when modifying gravity at large scales. To pass local tests of gravity, these modifications predominantly rely on nonlinear screening mechanisms that recover Einstein's Theory of General Relativity in regions of high density. We derive a set of conditions on the four free functions of the Horndeski action that examine whether a specific model embedded in the action possesses an Einstein gravity limit or not. For this purpose, we develop a new and surprisingly simple scaling method that identifies dominant terms in the equations of motion by considering formal limits of the couplings that enter through the new terms in the modified action. This enables us to find regimes where nonlinear terms dominate and Einstein's field equations are recovered to leading order. Together with an efficient approximation of the scalar field pro file, one can then further evaluate whether these limits can be attributed to a genuine screening effect. For illustration, we apply the analysis to both a cubic galileon and a chameleon model as well as to Brans-Dicke theory. Finally, we emphasise that the scaling method also provides a natural approach for performing post-Newtonian expansions in screened regimes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available