4.6 Article

Systematic renormalization of the effective theory of Large Scale Structure

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/063

Keywords

cosmological parameters from LSS; dark matter theory

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY-1314311, PHY-0855425, PHYS-1066293, PHY-1316452]
  2. Delta- ITP consortium, a program of the Netherlands organization for scientific research (NWO) - Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW)
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Physics [1521097] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A perturbative description of Large Scale Structure is a cornerstone of our understanding of the observed distribution of matter in the universe. Renormalization is an essential and defining step to make this description physical and predictive. Here we introduce a systematic renormalization procedure, which neatly associates counterterms to the UV-sensitive diagrams order by order, as it is commonly done in quantum field theory. As a concrete example, we renormalize the one-loop power spectrum and bispectrum of both density and velocity. In addition, we present a series of results that are valid to all orders in perturbation theory. First, we show that while systematic renormalization requires temporally non-local counterterms, in practice one can use an equivalent basis made of local operators. We give an explicit prescription to generate all counterterms allowed by the symmetries. Second, we present a formal proof of the well-known general argument that the contribution of short distance perturbations to large scale density contrast 6 and momentum density pi(k) scale as k(2) and k, respectively. Third, we demonstrate that the common practice of introducing counterterms only in the Euler equation when one is interested in correlators of delta is indeed valid to all orders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available