4.5 Article

Antihypertensive treatment effect on exercise blood pressure and exercise capacity in older adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 40, Issue 9, Pages 1682-1691

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003201

Keywords

antihypertensive agents; blood pressure; cardiovascular diseases; exercise; exercise tolerance; risk factors

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [067100, 60337055891, 086676/7/08/Z]
  2. British Heart Foundation [PG/06/145, PG/08/103/26133, PG/12/29/29497, CS/13/1/30327]
  3. Diabetes UK [13/0004774]
  4. National Heart Foundation of Australia Future Leader Fellowship [102553]
  5. National Institute of Health Research Clinical Research Network
  6. UK Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12019/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that pharmacological antihypertensive treatment does not fully mitigate an exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise in older adults, regardless of resting blood pressure control, suggesting residual cardiovascular disease risk in this population.
Background: An exaggerated blood pressure (BP) response to exercise and low exercise capacity are risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The effect of pharmacological antihypertensive treatment on exercise BP in older adults is largely unknown. This study investigates these effects accounting for differences in exercise capacity. Methods: Participants enrolled in the Southall and Brent Revisited (SABRE) study undertook a 6-min stepper test with expired gas analysis and BP measured throughout exercise. Participants were stratified by antihypertensive treatment status and resting BP control. Exercise systolic and diastolic BP (exSBP and exDBP) were compared between groups using potential outcome means [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] adjusted for exercise capacity. Exercise capacity was also compared by group. Results: In total, 659 participants were included (mean age +/- SD: 73 +/- 6.6 years, 57% male). 31% of normotensive and 23% of hypertensive older adults with controlled resting BP had an exaggerated exercise BP. ExSBP was similar between normotensive and treated/controlled individuals [mean (95%CI): 180 (176 184) mmHg vs. 177 (173 181) mmHg, respectively] but was higher in treated/uncontrolled and untreated/uncontrolled individuals [mean (95% CI): 194 (190 197) mmHg, P < 0.001 and 199 (194 204) mmHg, P < 0.001, respectively]; these differences persisted after adjustment for exercise capacity and other confounders. Exercise capacity was lower in treated vs. normotensive individuals [mean (95% CI) normotensive: 16.7 (16.0,17.4) ml/kg/min]; treated/controlled: 15.5 (14.8,16.1) ml/kg/min, P = 0.009; treated/uncontrolled: [15.1 (14.5,15.7) ml/kg per min, P = 0.001] but was not reduced in untreated/uncontrolled individuals [mean (95% CI): 17.0 (16.1,17.8) ml/kg per min, P = 0.621]. Conclusion: Irrespective of resting BP control and despite performing less exercise, antihypertensive treatment does not fully mitigate an exaggerated BP response to exercise suggesting residual CVD risk in older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available