4.7 Article

Power transformation of variables for post-processing precipitation forecasts: Regionally versus locally optimized parameter values

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 610, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127912

Keywords

Data transformation; Numerical weather prediction; Post-processing; Precipitation; Forecast verification; Australia

Funding

  1. ARC Linkage Project [LP170100922]
  2. ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher Award [DE210100117]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP170100922, DE210100117] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Short-term precipitation forecasts often require statistical calibration to improve accuracy and reliability. This study finds that using a regionally optimized two parameter value approach can achieve good forecast calibration performance while maintaining spatial consistency.
Short-term precipitation forecasts are mainly derived from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Raw NWP forecasts typically require post-processing to improve their accuracy and reliability through statistical calibration. For post-processing precipitation forecasts, several well-known calibration models employ power transformation to remove the positive skewness of precipitation. The most common practice is to use a pre-fixed transformation parameter value for both observation and forecast variables. Another approach is to allow the parameter values to differ for the two variables and locally optimize them at a spatial point to ensure the best performance of a calibration model. However, when calibrating forecasts across many grid points in a region, there is a considerable advantage in keeping the transformation parameter values constant, to enable spatial consistency in the calibration model so that model information transfers from gauged to ungauged locations can be easily achieved. For this reason, a third approach is proposed here to regionally optimize the parameter values for the two variables. A question then arises: how do the three different approaches affect forecast calibration performance? This question is answered in this study by evaluating the calibration performance of precipitation forecasts across 20 locations in Australia. The pre-fixed one parameter value approach is found to lead to poor performance. The regionally optimized two parameter value approach is almost as good as the locally optimized two parameter value approach, but has the additional advantage of spatial consistency for regional applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available