4.4 Article

Unintended consequences of welfare reform: Evidence from birthweight of Aboriginal children in Australia

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102618

Keywords

Welfare reform; Aboriginal children; Birthweight; Income management; Unintended consequences

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [DE140100463]
  2. NT Government
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Early Career Research Award
  4. University of Sydney SOAR Fellowship (2017-2018)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2007, Australia implemented the 'income management' policy to protect children in Aboriginal communities. The study finds that this policy resulted in reduced birth weight and increased risk of low birth weight among Aboriginal children, potentially due to the lack of implementation planning and infrastructure leading to income insecurity and stress.
In 2007, Australia introduced its most radical welfare reform in recent history, targeting Aboriginal communities with the aim of protecting children from harm. The 'income management' policy forced Aboriginal welfare recipients to spend at least half of their government transfers on essentials (e.g. food, housing), and less on non-essentials (e.g. alcohol, tobacco). By exploiting its staggered rollout, we estimate the impact of in utero exposure to the policy rollout on birth weight. We find that exposure to the income management policy reduced average birthweight robustly by 85 g and increased the risk of low birth weight by 3 percentage points. This finding is not explained by behavioral change (fertility, maternal risk behavior, access to care), or survival probabilities of at-risk fetuses. More likely, a lack of policy implementation planning and infrastructure led to acute income insecurity and stress during the rollout period, exacerbating the existing health inequalities it sought to address.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available