4.3 Article

Comparative analysis of fetal pig decomposition processes in burials of variable depths and wrapping

Journal

JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages 2192-2202

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15120

Keywords

burial; decomposition; fetal; forensic anthropology; postmortem interval (PMI); taphonomy; TBS; total body score

Funding

  1. Boston University School of Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research examined the effects of burial depth and presence of plastic wrapping on the decomposition rate of fetal pig remains. It found that wrapping significantly influenced the decomposition, while burial depth did not.
This research examined the effects that the variables of burial depth and presence of plastic wrapping had on the decomposition rate of fetal pig (Sus scrofa) remains in a New England environment. The decomposition of 56 fetal pigs was observed in four independent variable groups: 20 cm depth unwrapped, 20 cm wrapped, 60 cm unwrapped, and 60 cm wrapped, with exhumation at months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18. The authors hypothesized that the rate of decay would be slower for wrapped remains and/or for remains at a greater burial depth. Analysis of these remains consisted of preburial and postburial mass, adipocere coverage, skeletal exposure, and decomposition quantified as Total Body Score (TBS). The difference between preburial and postburial mass was reported as a loss percentage to account for varying preburial masses. Wrapping was a significant influencer of mass loss percentage, with p = 0.0298 but not for the TBS, with p = 0.17565. Burial depth did not have a significant effect on either mass loss percentage or TBS, with p = 0.1956 and 0.08969, respectively. This study suggests that wrapping has a greater influence on decomposition patterns than burial depth in this environment, particularly the mass loss percentage. It is suggested that there are limitations with the use of TBS in Postmortem Interval (PMI) estimation, such as variable burial conditions and body characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available