4.8 Article

Nanotechnology for protein delivery: Overview and perspectives

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages 24-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.012

Keywords

Nanotechnology; Nanoparticle; Protein delivery; Therapy; Non-invasive administration

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [EB015419, R00CA160350, U54-CA151884]
  2. Movember-Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) Challenge Award
  3. PCF Young Investigator Award
  4. David Koch-PCF Program in Nanotherapeutics
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [K1A1A2048701]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein-based therapeutics havemade a significant impact in the treatment of a variety of important human diseases. However, given their intrinsically vulnerable structure and susceptibility to enzymatic degradation, many therapeutic proteins such as enzymes, growth factors, hormones, and cytokines suffer from poor physicochemical/biological stability and immunogenicity that may limit their potential benefits, and in some cases limit their utility. Furthermore, when protein therapeutics are developed for intracellular targets, their internalization and biological activity may be limited by inefficient membrane permeability and/or endosomal escape. Development of effective protein delivery strategies is therefore essential to further enhance therapeutic outcomes to enable widespread medical applications. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of marketed and developmental-stage protein delivery strategies, and provides a focused overview of recent advances in nanotechnology platforms for the systemic delivery of therapeutic proteins. In addition, we also highlight nanoparticle-mediated non-invasive administration approaches (e.g., oral, nasal, pulmonary, and transdermal routes) for protein delivery. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available