4.4 Article

How Did the COVID-19 Restrictions Impact People Living With Dementia and Their Informal Carers Within Community and Residential Aged Care Settings in Australia? A Qualitative Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 205-218

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10748407221101638

Keywords

COVID-19; dementia; social support; informal carers

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to explore the changes in formal social support after the implementation of COVID-19 public health measures and how these restrictions affected people living with dementia and their informal carers in Australia. The findings highlighted the pre-pandemic limitations of the aged care system in Australia and the additional burden placed on informal carers supporting people with dementia during the pandemic.
The aim of this study was to explore how formal social support changed after implementation of the COVID-19 public health measures and how these restrictions affected people living with dementia and their informal carers in Australia. Sixteen informal carers and two people living with dementia were interviewed between August and November 2020. Participants were asked about their experiences of the pandemic and the impact that the restrictions had on their lives and care. Thematic analysis identified four overarching themes describing (a) prepandemic limitations of the aged care system, (b) the aged care system's response to the COVID-19 restrictions, (c) changes affecting informal carers, and (d) the challenges faced by people living with dementia. The findings highlighted the challenges faced by the Australian aged care system before the pandemic and the additional burden placed on informal carers who supported people living with dementia across residential and home settings during the pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available