4.7 Article

Profiling of epigenetic marker regions in murine ILCs under homeostatic and inflammatory conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 219, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20210663

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG LO1415/8-1]
  2. DFG [NE 1966/2-1, FL 965/1-1]
  3. Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft, Zukunftsthema Immunology and Inflammation [ZT-0027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and epigenetic marker regions in murine lymph node-derived ILCs using genome-wide DNA methylation profiling. The marker regions showed strong correlation with the expression of associated genes, suggesting their functional relevance. These epigenetic markers can serve as a tool to study phenotypic and functional properties of ILCs.
Epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation play an essential role in imprinting specific transcriptional patterns in cells. We performed genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of murine lymph node-derived ILCs, which led to the identification of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and the definition of epigenetic marker regions in ILCs. Marker regions were located in genes with a described function for ILCs, such as Tbx21, Gata3, or Il23r, but also in genes that have not been related to ILC biology. Methylation levels of the marker regions and expression of the associated genes were strongly correlated, indicating their functional relevance. Comparison with T helper cell methylomes revealed clear lineage differences, despite partial similarities in the methylation of specific ILC marker regions. IL-33-mediated challenge affected methylation of ILC2 epigenetic marker regions in the liver, while remaining relatively stable in the lung. In our study, we identified a set of epigenetic markers that can serve as a tool to study phenotypic and functional properties of ILCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available