4.6 Article

GC-MS metabolites profiling of anethole-rich oils by different extraction techniques: antioxidant, cytotoxicity and in-silico enzymes inhibitory insights

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENZYME INHIBITION AND MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 1974-1986

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2022.2097445

Keywords

Essential oils; GC-MS profiling; in-silico study; metabolomics; antioxidant; cytotoxicity activity

Funding

  1. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [PNURSP2022R25]
  2. Umm Al-Qura University [22UQU4290565DSR39]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the chemical composition and biological activities of anise and star anise oils obtained by different extraction methods. Microwave-assisted extraction method resulted in star anise oil with the highest content of trans-anethole, showing excellent antioxidant and cytotoxic activities.
GC-MS profiling and metabolomics study of anise and star anise oils obtained by hydrodistillation, n-hexane, and microwave-assisted extraction methods were conducted herein. Trans-anethole was the major phenylpropanoid in both oils. Principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses revealed a clear separation of different extraction methods. Microwave-assisted star anise oil (MSA) revealed the highest anethole content (93.78%). MSA oil showed antioxidant activity using DPPH and ABTS assays, this was verified via an in-silico docking study of its major compounds on human tyrosinase and NAD(P)H oxidase. Trans-anethole displayed the best fitting scores (-8.9 and -10.1 Kcal/mole, respectively). MSA oil showed promising cytotoxic activity on different cell lines, mainly the cervical (HeLa) cell lines. Cell cycle inhibition at the G0-G1 phase was observed with an early apoptotic effect of the oil on HeLa cells. Trans-anethole achieved the best docking scores (-7.9, -9.3 and -9.9 Kcal/mole) for in-silico study on EGFR, CDK2 and CDK4 enzymes engaged in cancer, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available