4.6 Article

Global robust Bayesian analysis in large models

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS
Volume 235, Issue 2, Pages 608-642

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.06.004

Keywords

Prior sensitivity; Bayesian estimation; VAR; DSGE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops a tool for global prior sensitivity analysis in large Bayesian models. The methodology provides bounds for posterior means or quantiles given any prior close to the original in relative entropy and reveals features of the prior that are important for the posterior statistics of interest. It finds that the prior tightness hyperparameters in the hierarchical vector autoregression model from Giannone et al. (2015) are relatively insensitive to their hyperpriors, but the error bands for the impulse response of output to a monetary policy shock in the New Keynesian model of Smets and Wouters (2007) depend heavily on the prior.
This paper develops a tool for global prior sensitivity analysis in large Bayesian models. Without imposing parametric restrictions, the methodology provides bounds for pos-terior means or quantiles given any prior close to the original in relative entropy and reveals features of the prior that are important for the posterior statistics of interest. We develop a sequential Monte Carlo algorithm and use approximations to the likelihood and statistic of interest to implement the calculations. The methodology finds that the prior tightness hyperparameters in the hierarchical vector autoregression model from Giannone et al. (2015) are relatively insensitive to their hyperpriors. However, in the New Keynesian model of Smets and Wouters (2007), the error bands for the impulse response of output to a monetary policy shock depend heavily on the prior. The upper bound is especially sensitive, and the prior on wage rigidity plays a particularly important role.& COPY; 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available