4.6 Article

Complementarity of experiments in probing the non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter-nucleon interactions

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/06/026

Keywords

dark matter theory; dark matter experiments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a method to determine an upper limit on the dark matter-nucleon interaction strength, taking into account all possible interferences among operators. The method is illustrated using the null search results from XENON1T, PICO-60, and IceCube, and it also introduces a way to combine results from different experiments to explore the parameter space of dark matter-nucleon interactions more comprehensively.
The non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter-nucleon interactions depends on 28 coupling strengths for dark matter spin up to 1/2. Due to the vast parameter space of the effective theory, most experiments searching for dark matter interpret the results assuming that only one of the coupling strengths is non-zero. On the other hand, dark matter models generically lead in the non-relativistic limit to several interactions which interfere with one another, therefore the published limits cannot be straightforwardly applied to model predictions. We present a method to determine a rigorous upper limit on the dark matter-nucleon interaction strength including all possible interferences among operators. We illustrate the method to derive model independent upper limits on the interaction strengths from the null search results from XENON1T, PICO-60 and IceCube. For some interactions, the limits on the coupling strengths are relaxed by more than one order of magnitude. We also present a method that allows to combine the results from different experiments, thus exploiting the synergy between different targets in exploring the parameter space of dark matter-nucleon interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available