4.6 Article

Ultraviolet freeze-in with a time-dependent inflaton decay

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/07/019

Keywords

dark matter theory; particle physics-cosmology connection; physics of the early universe

Funding

  1. Patrimonio Aut?nomo - Fondo Nacional de Fi- nanciamiento para la Ciencia [80740-465-2020, 80740-492-2021, FPA2017-84543-P]
  2. (Ciencias - Colombia) [2017-16286, 2020-33177]
  3. Sostenibilidad- UdeA [860881, H2020-MSCA-ITN-2019 HIDDeN]
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sk?odowska-Curie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the impact of the time-dependent decay width of the inflaton on the abundance of dark matter (DM) during the reheating period. The study demonstrates that the time-dependence of the decay width has different effects on the DM abundance compared to instantaneous or constant decay. Concrete examples of DM production through 2-to-2 scatterings of standard model particles or via inflaton scatterings or decays are provided to elucidate how the time-dependence influences the yield of DM.
It is typically assumed that during reheating the inflaton decays with a constant decay width. However, this is not guaranteed and can have a strong impact on the dark matter (DM) genesis. In the context of the ultraviolet (UV) freeze-in mechanism, if the operators connecting the dark and visible sectors are of sufficiently high mass dimension, the bulk of the DM abundance is produced during and not after reheating. We study here the impact of a time-dependent decay width of the inflaton on the DM abundance, emphasizing the differences with respect to the cases where the decay is either instantaneous or constant. We also provide concrete examples for DM production via UV freeze-in, e.g., from 2-to-2 scatterings of standard model particles, or from inflaton scatterings or decays, elucidating how the time-dependence influences the DM yield.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available