4.1 Article

Marek's Disease in an Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) with Clinical Ocular Disease and Paraparesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGY
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages 7-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2022.04.003

Keywords

Marek's disease; ocular lesions; paraparesis; peafowl

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports a case of Marek's disease in an Indian peafowl, which presented with hindlimb paraparesis and intraocular swelling of the right eye. Histological examination revealed lymphoid neoplasia at multiple sites and extensive hepatic lymphoid cell infiltration.
Marek's disease (MD) is caused by virulent strains of Gallid alphaherpesvirus type 2 (MD virus serotype 1; MDV 1) and frequently causes a lymphoproliferative disorder in poultry and other galliform birds worldwide. However, within the peafowl (Phasianinae) subfamily, there are only rare confirmed reports of MD. Here we report MDin an Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus), which clinically presented with hindlimb paraparesis and intraocular swelling of the right eye. Soft, off-white to tan masses within the right eye, sciatic nerves and coelomic cavity were identified at post-mortem examination which effaced the cranial pole of the kidneys and diffusely effaced the testes. Lymphoid neoplasia was identified histologically at all of these sites and there was extensive hepatic lymphoid cell infiltration, which had not been grossly evident. The T-cell origin of the lymphoid cells was confirmed by immunohistochemistry for CD3 antigen. A virulent strain of MDV 1 was detected by realtime polymerase chain reaction in DNA samples extracted from the kidney and testes. AsMDis rare in peafowl it should be considered as a differential diagnosis for intraocular and coelomic masses with associated clinical signs. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available