4.6 Article

Predicting the risk of dental implant loss using deep learning

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 9, Pages 872-883

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13689

Keywords

cone-beam computed tomography; deep learning; dental implant loss; risk prediction model

Funding

  1. Chongqing Medical University Chongqing Postgraduate Tutor Team Construction Project [dstd201903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81771082, 31971282, 82001103, 82171010]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China [cstc2019jcyj-bshX0005, cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0366, cstc2021jcyj-jqX0028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the feasibility of predicting dental implant loss risk using deep learning based on preoperative cone-beam computed tomography. The research suggests that an integrated model and a DL model performed well in predicting implant fate within 5 years, offering useful tools for assessing preoperative risks in implant practice.
Aim To investigate the feasibility of predicting dental implant loss risk with deep learning (DL) based on preoperative cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods Six hundred and three patients who underwent implant surgery (279 high-risk patients who did and 324 low-risk patients who did not experience implant loss within 5 years) between January 2012 and January 2020 were enrolled. Three models, a logistic regression clinical model (CM) based on clinical features, a DL model based on radiography features, and an integrated model (IM) developed by combining CM with DL, were developed to predict the 5-year implant loss risk. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the model performance. Time to implant loss was considered for both groups, and Kaplan-Meier curves were created and compared by the log-rank test. Results The IM exhibited the best performance in predicting implant loss risk (AUC = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.95), followed by the DL model (AUC = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.92) and the CM (AUC = 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.79). Conclusions Our study offers preliminary evidence that both the DL model and the IM performed well in predicting implant fate within 5 years and thus may greatly facilitate implant practitioners in assessing preoperative risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available