Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent
Nicolas Mottet et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2021)
Significant Inter- and Intralaboratory Variation in Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Study of 35,258 Patients in The Netherlands
Rachel N. Flach et al.
CANCERS (2021)
Variation in the Prescription of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy in the Netherlands, and Adherence to European Association of Urology Guidelines: A Population-based Study
Barbara Lily Therese Rijksen et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS (2021)
Ten-year Mortality, Disease Progression, and Treatment-related Side Effects in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer from the ProtecT Randomised Controlled Trial According to Treatment Received
David E. Neal et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2020)
Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study
Peter Strom et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2020)
Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study
Wouter Bulten et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2020)
Variation in breast cancer grading: the effect of creating awareness through laboratory-specific and pathologist-specific feedback reports in 16 734 patients with breast cancer
Carmen van Dooijeweert et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY (2020)
Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies
Patricia Raciti et al.
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2020)
The effect of an e-learning module on grading variation of (pre)malignant breast lesions
Carmen van Dooijeweert et al.
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2020)
Histopathological re-evaluations of biopsies in prostate cancer: a nationwide observational study
B. W. H. van Santvoort et al.
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2020)
Decrease of variation in the grading of dysplasia in colorectal adenomas with a national e-learning module
Ariana Madani et al.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (2019)
Immediate treatment vs. active-surveillance in very-low-risk prostate cancer: the role of patient-, tumour-, and hospital-related factors
Hanneke Jansen et al.
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES (2019)
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent
Nicolas Mottet et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2017)
Uptake of Active Surveillance for Very-Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in Sweden
Stacy Loeb et al.
JAMA ONCOLOGY (2017)
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2016)
Improved quality of patient care through routine second review of histopathology specimens prior to multidisciplinary meetings
Chantal C. H. J. Kuijpers et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY (2016)
Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
J. L. Donovan et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)
Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer
Tayyar A. Ozkan et al.
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Stratification of High-risk Prostate Cancer into Prognostic Categories: A European Multi-institutional Study
Steven Joniau et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2015)
Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
M. Minhaj Siddiqui et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2015)
Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system
Phillip M. Pierorazio et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2013)
Updated Nomogram Predicting Lymph Node Invasion in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: The Essential Importance of Percentage of Positive Cores
Alberto Briganti et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2012)
Inaccuracies in Assignment of Clinical Stage for Localized Prostate Cancer
Adam C. Reese et al.
CANCER (2011)
The Potential Impact of Reproducibility of Gleason Grading in Men With Early Stage Prostate Cancer Managed by Active Surveillance: A Multi-Institutional Study
Jesse K. McKenney et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2011)
The Interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer
C. Gosselaar et al.
PROSTATE (2008)
Accuracy of gleason grading by practicing pathologists and the impact of education on improving agreement
Y Mikami et al.
HUMAN PATHOLOGY (2003)
Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists
WC Allsbrook et al.
HUMAN PATHOLOGY (2001)
Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: General pathologists
WC Allsbrook et al.
HUMAN PATHOLOGY (2001)
Share Paper
