4.5 Article

Punching shear behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite plate under patch loads

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH
Volume 121, Issue -, Pages 50-64

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.016

Keywords

Steel-concrete-steel sandwich plate; Punching shear resistance; Shear connectors; Steel-concrete composite structure; Cement composite; Fiber reinforced concrete; ULCC; Double skin structure

Funding

  1. Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore
  2. American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)
  3. National University of Singapore [R-302-501-002-490]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studied the structural behaviors of steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite plates under patch loads. Ten SCS sandwich plates, adopting an ultra-lightweight cement composite (ULCC) and overlapped headed studs as the bonding measures at the steel-concrete interface, were simply supported and subjected to patch loads till failure. The investigated parameters included spacing of the connectors, strength of the ULCC core, thickness of the steel skin, volume fraction of the fiber, and depth of the cross section. Test results estimated the size of the punching cone and showed that load-defection behaviors of the SCS sandwich plate contained five stages. The influences of the different parameters have been discussed and analyzed. Analytical models have been developed to predict the ultimate resistances of the SCS sandwich plate under patch loads through modifying the code equations. These innovations and modifications included developing models to predict the tensile resistance of the connectors, incorporating the contribution of the top steel skin on the punching shear resistance, consideration of the tensile resistance of the connectors on the second peak resistance of the structure, and adopting a proper critical perimeter. The validations of the predictions against the test results showed that the code provisions overestimated ultimate resistances of the SCS sandwich plates and the developed analytical models offered reasonably good agreements. Design recommendations were finally given based on these validations and discussions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available