Complementary Nonsputum Diagnostic Testing for Tuberculosis in People with HIV Using Oral Swab PCR and Urine Lipoarabinomannan Detection

Testing for mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan (LAM) in urine is a practical but insensitive alternative to sputum testing to diagnose tuberculosis (TB) in people with HIV (PWH). Here, we evaluated urine LAM testing alongside PCR-based tests for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) DNA in tongue swabs. We hypothesized that the two nonsputum samples would deliver complementary, not redundant, results. The study included 131 South African patients of whom 64 (48.1%) were confirmed to have TB by GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) or culture analysis of sputum. A total of 120 patients (91.6%) were coinfected with HIV and 130 yielded a valid urine LAM result (Alere DETERMINE LAM Ag). Tongue swab samples were tested by IS6/10-targeted qPCR with a quantification cycle (Cq) cutoff of 32. Relative to reference sputum testing (TB culture and Xpert Ultra), combined urine LAM and oral swab testing (either sample positive) was significantly more sensitive than either nonsputum sample alone (57% sensitivity for combined testing versus 35% and 39% sensitivity for urine LAM and tongue swabs; P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). Specificity of combined testing (neither sample positive) was 97%. On average, tongue swab-positive participants had higher sputum signal strength than urine-LAM positive participants, as measured by sputum Xpert Ultra Cq value (P = 0.037). A subset of tongue swabs (N = 18) was also tested by using Xpert Ultra, which reproduced true positive and true negative 66110 qPCR results and resolved the two false-positive tongue swabs. With further development, tongue swabs and urine may feasibly serve as complementary nonsputum samples for diagnosis of TB in PWH.

Automated summary

This study evaluated the use of urine LAM and tongue swabs for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. The results showed that combined testing of urine LAM and tongue swabs was more sensitive than using either nonsputum sample alone. Participants with tongue swab-positive results had higher sputum signal strength, suggesting that tongue swabs may serve as a complementary nonsputum sample for TB diagnosis.