4.6 Article

A multistakeholder development process to prioritize and translate COVID-19 health recommendations for patients, caregivers and the public. A case study of the COVID-19 recommendation map

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 104-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.012

Keywords

COVID-19; Recommendations; Guidance; Plain language summaries; GRADE; Patient and public guidelines; COVID-19 vaccines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to develop a digital communication tool to improve the implementation of COVID-19 recommendations. The study involves multi-stakeholder engagement and provides three plain language recommendation formats. The results indicate that this approach is effective in enhancing guideline communication and understanding.
Background and Objectives: To develop a digital communication tool to improve the implementation of up-to-date COVID-19 recommendations. Specifically, to improve patient, caregiver and public understanding of healthcare recommendations on prevention, diagnoses and treatment. Methods: Multi-stakeholder engagement design. In conjunction with the COVID-19 Recommendations and Gateway to Contextualization RecMap, we co-developed a stakeholder prioritization, drafting and editing process to enhance guideline communication and understanding. Results: This paper presents the multi-stakeholder development process with three distinct plain language recommendation formats: formal recommendation, good practice statement, and additional guidance. Our case study of COVID-19 plain language recommendations PLRs addresses both public health interventions (e.g., vaccination, face masks) and clinical interventions (e.g., home pulse oximetry). Conclusion: This paper presents a novel approach to engaging stakeholders in improving the communication and understanding of published guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available