4.7 Article

Backing biodiversity? German consumers' views on a multi-level biodiversity-labeling scheme for beef from grazing-based production systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 370, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133471

Keywords

Animal welfare; Biodiversity conservation; Consumer perception; Multi-level labeling; Online focus groups; Pasture-raised beef

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [031B0734D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intensive livestock farming leads to biodiversity loss, while grazing-based beef production supports ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. Consumer understanding of labels certifying biodiversity benefits is low, and trust in certification and control procedures is hindered by the abundance of labeling schemes. However, consumers appreciate biodiversity conservation at the local level and have higher levels of trust in short supply chains, indicating opportunities for selling pasture-raised beef.
Biodiversity loss driven by intensive livestock farming constitutes a major threat to the resilience of food systems. Grazing-based beef production, by contrast, supports ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. Communicating these benefits to consumers is vital to stimulate demand for pasture-raised beef, with labels being a key means of conveying such credence attributes. Despite extensive research on eco-labels and sus-tainability certification, however, we know little about consumer perceptions of labels designed to certify and highlight the biodiversity benefits of cattle products. To address this gap, we conducted six audio-only online focus group discussions with forty buyers of beef in Germany to explore consumer perceptions of a multi-level labeling system of labeling designed to differentiate between the conservation measures applied in pasture -raised beef production. Our findings indicate significant challenges for the implementation of such labeling, including low levels of understanding of biodiversity among consumers. Most participants struggled to discriminate between different levels of biodiversity conservation measures and placed little value on the biodiversity benefits of different products. Gaining trust in certification and control procedures is problematic due to the profusion of labeling schemes on the market, especially given consumers' time pressures. However, our findings also highlight consumers' appreciation for biodiversity conservation at local level and higher levels of trust in short supply chains, suggesting opportunities for selling pasture-raised beef at local level. The dif-ferences we identify in consumers' use of labeling can inform further segmentation research and targeted communications to market beef from grazing-based production systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available