4.7 Article

Measuring sustainability of suppliers: Strategies for competing institutional logics

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 360, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132226

Keywords

Institutional logics; Sustainability; Sustainable supply chain management; Sustainable supply chain strategies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study develops and tests a measurement model of sustainable supply chain strategies, identifying three theoretically-driven strategies and confirming a three-dimensional measurement model through survey data analysis and review of literature and corporate practices. Scholars and managers can use this model to investigate the implications of diverse sustainability strategies at supply chain context.
While the growing literature has examined the strategies of buyers to ensure the sustainability of suppliers, the underlying theoretical dynamics and measurement of such strategies have been overlooked. Drawing on institutional logics perspective, this study develops and tests a measurement model of sustainable supply chain strategies. The study identifies three theoretically-driven strategies as performance-oriented strategy for commercial logic, risk avoidance-oriented strategy for public logic, and collaboration-oriented strategy for socialwelfare logic. Then, a measurement construct is developed through the review of extant literature and corporate practices as well as using the findings of a semi-structured interview with 21 managers in nine suppliers. The construct is tested based on a survey data drawn from a sample of 131 suppliers of Western companies in Turkey. The analysis confirms a three-dimensional measurement model. Considering the importance of knowing how to strategically approach a supplier to ensure its sustainability, both scholars and managers can use this model to investigate the implications of formulation and implementation of diverse sustainability strategies at supply chain context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available