4.7 Article

Industrial-scale valorization of fine recycled aggregates in cement raw meal: Towards sustainable mixtures

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 362, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132231

Keywords

Construction & demolition waste; Fine recycled aggregates; Industrial cement production; Cement raw meal; Durability; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. SeRaMCo Interreg NWE Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to improve the sustainability of cement and concrete mixes by using recycled aggregates in the production of recycled clinker and cement. The findings confirm the feasibility of producing clinkers and cements with recycled aggregates, meeting the industry's required performance, and reducing resource depletion in the cement industry.
The aim of this study is to improve the sustainability of cement and concrete mixes. To do so, the fine recycled aggregates (FRA) from construction and demolition wastes (CDW) were used in cement raw meals (CRM) to produce recycled clinker and cement to be used in the mix design of new concretes. About 7000 tons of clinker containing 1000 tons of FRA were generated at industrial scale, in a cement plant. Clinker was then incorporated into CEM I and CEM II recycled cements. The findings of this study confirm the feasibility of producing clinkers and cements with FRA, meeting the industry's required performance, and at the same time reducing resource depletion in the cement industry. These cements were also incorporated in new ordinary and high performance concretes. The results show slight differences in mechanical and durability properties, when recycled cements are used. From a performance approach viewpoint, the high performance concretes (conventional and recycled) are ranked as highly durable, while the ordinary concretes are ranked as low-medium durable ones, regardless the presence of FRA in cements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available