4.7 Article

Optimal selection for wind power coupled hydrogen energy storage from a risk perspective, considering the participation of multi-stakeholder

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 356, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131853

Keywords

Wind power; Hydrogen energy storage; Risk analysis; TODIM; MCDM; Stakeholder

Funding

  1. Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences [19AGL027]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020MS066]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study establishes a comprehensive risk analysis framework considering multi-stakeholder participation to select the optimal site for wind power coupled hydrogen energy storage. The results show that Guyuan county is the best choice and the overall results are more sensitive to the government and investors.
Wind power coupled hydrogen energy storage (WPCHES) has recently emerged as a key to achieving the goal of peaking carbon dioxide emissions as well as carbon neutrality. However, WPCHES industry develops sluggishly with numerous uncertainties due to the complex interest environment caused by plant and power grid separation. To select the optimal site of WPCHES with enormous difficulties lying in different and intersecting interest demands of stakeholders and different risk appetites of decision-makers, this paper establishes an overarching risk analysis framework of WPCHES considering the participation of multi-stakeholder. First, a synthetic risk factor system for WPCHES is constructed based on the interest claim of stakeholders, containing 5 categories of risk and 13 factors concerned by 3 stakeholders. Subsequently, Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory and Entropy are combined under the proportional hesitant fuzzy environment to ensure the complementarity of approaches and the uncertainty of evaluation information. Finally, novel usage of TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of interactive and multi-criteria decision-making) is proposed to investigate potential trade-offs between conflicting goals among stakeholders. The case result demonstrates that Guyuan county of Shijiazhuang city in Hebei province is the optimal choice with the biggest advantage and the least stakeholders' risk appetite sensitivity. A further finding is that the overall results are more sensitive to Government and Investor, rather than to Power grid. Interestingly, various solutions have different sensitivity to each stakeholder. Besides, the bidirectional preferences between stakeholders and alternatives are also obtained. At last, the sensitivity analysis and the comparative analysis with popular algorithms confirmed that the model proposed by this paper is a reliable and practical choice for complex multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available