4.7 Article

Ab initio machine learning of phase space averages

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 157, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0095674

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC-CoG)
  2. European Union [772834]
  3. NCCR MARVEL
  4. National Center of Competence in Research - Swiss National Science Foundation [182892]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a method to machine learn phase space averages, allowing the prediction of ensemble properties and solvation free energies of chemical compounds. The proposed approach bypasses the need for traditional molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo simulations, significantly accelerating exploration campaigns in the chemical compound space.
Equilibrium structures determine material properties and biochemical functions. We here propose to machine learn phase space averages, conventionally obtained by ab initio or force-field-based molecular dynamics (MD) or Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. In analogy to ab initio MD, our ab initio machine learning (AIML) model does not require bond topologies and, therefore, enables a general machine learning pathway to obtain ensemble properties throughout the chemical compound space. We demonstrate AIML for predicting Boltzmann averaged structures after training on hundreds of MD trajectories. The AIML output is subsequently used to train machine learning models of free energies of solvation using experimental data and to reach competitive prediction errors (mean absolute error similar to 0.8 kcal/mol) for out-of-sample molecules-within milliseconds. As such, AIML effectively bypasses the need for MD or MC-based phase space sampling, enabling exploration campaigns of Boltzmann averages throughout the chemical compound space at a much accelerated pace. We contextualize our findings by comparison to state-of-the-art methods resulting in a Pareto plot for the free energy of solvation predictions in terms of accuracy and time. (C) 2022 Author(s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available