4.6 Review

Epigenetic mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets in stroke

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 2000-2016

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X221116192

Keywords

Biomarkers; cerebral ischemia; epigenomics; hemorrhagic stroke; neuroprotection

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01NS099531, R01NS101960, R01NS109459]
  2. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin
  3. US Department of Veterans Affairs [IK6BX005690]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epigenetic modifications play a central role in the progression of stroke pathology, regulating gene expression, cellular injury response, and functional outcomes after stroke. Technological advances in epigenetics may provide innovative targets and promising therapeutic approaches for stroke treatment.
Accumulating evidence indicates a central role for epigenetic modifications in the progression of stroke pathology. These epigenetic mechanisms are involved in complex and dynamic processes that modulate post-stroke gene expression, cellular injury response, motor function, and cognitive ability. Despite decades of research, stroke continues to be classified as a leading cause of death and disability worldwide with limited clinical interventions. Thus, technological advances in the field of epigenetics may provide innovative targets to develop new stroke therapies. This review presents the evidence on the impact of epigenomic readers, writers, and erasers in both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke pathophysiology. We specifically explore the role of DNA methylation, DNA hydroxymethylation, histone modifications, and epigenomic regulation by long non-coding RNAs in modulating gene expression and functional outcome after stroke. Furthermore, we highlight promising pharmacological approaches and biomarkers in relation to epigenetics for translational therapeutic applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available