Journal
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1424-1433Publisher
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.06.009
Keywords
Financial hardship; financial toxicity; heart failure; medical bills; out-of-pocket costs
Categories
Funding
- Katz Academy for Translational Research
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Financial hardship due to medical bills is a prevalent issue for patients with heart failure in the US, especially among younger individuals with lower educational attainment. Policies that reduce out-of-pocket costs and improved identification of this phenomenon in the clinical setting are needed to minimize financial toxicity while ensuring optimal care.
Background: Heart failure (HF) poses a substantial economic burden on the United States (US) health care system. In contrast, little is known about the financial challenges faced by patients with HF. In this study, we examined the scope and sociodemographic predictors of subjective financial hardship due to medical bills incurred by patients with HF. Methods: In the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS; years 2014-2018), a US nationally representative database, we identified all patients who reported having HF. Any subjective financial hardship due to medical bills was assessed based on patients' reporting either themselves or their families (1) having difficulties paying medical bills in the past 12 months, (2) paying bills late or (3) being unable to pay bills at all. Logistic regression was used to evaluate independent predictors of financial hardship among patients with HF. All analyses took into consideration the survey's complex design. Results: A total of 116,563 MEPS participants were included in the analysis, of whom 858 (0.7%) had diagnoses of HF, representing 1.8 million (95% CI 1.6-2.0) patients annually. Overall, 33% (95% CI 29%-38%) reported any financial hardship due to medical bills, and 13.2% were not able to pay bills at all. Age <= 65 years and lower educational attainment were independently associated with higher odds of subjective financial hardship due to medical bills. Conclusion: Subjective financial hardship is a prevalent issue for patients with HF in the US, particularly those who are younger and have lower educational attainment. There is a need for policies that reduce out-of-pocket costs for the care of HF, an enhanced identification of this phenomenon in the clinical setting, and approaches to help minimize financial toxicity in patients with HF while ensuring optimal quality of care.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available