4.6 Article

Palovarotene for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase 2 Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 1891-1902

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4655

Keywords

CELL; TISSUE SIGNALING; CLINICAL TRIALS; FIBRODYSPLASIA OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; RADIOLOGY

Funding

  1. Clementia Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO). This study evaluated palovarotene as a potential treatment for preventing HO in FOP patients. The results showed that palovarotene reduced HO occurrence, but the difference between palovarotene and placebo was not statistically significant. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger studies.
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO), often heralded by flare-ups, leading to reduced movement and life expectancy. This placebo-controlled, double-blind trial (NCT02190747) evaluated palovarotene, an orally bioavailable selective retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist, for prevention of HO in patients with FOP. Patients experiencing a flare-up were enrolled in two cohorts: (1) patients >= 15 years were randomized 3:1 to palovarotene 10/5 mg (weeks 1-2/3-6) or placebo; (2) patients >= 6 years were randomized 3:3:2 to palovarotene 10/5 mg, palovarotene 5/2.5 mg (weeks 1-2/3-6), or placebo. Cohort data were pooled. The primary endpoint was the proportion of responders (no/minimal new HO at flare-up body region by plain radiograph) at week 6. Change from baseline in HO volume and new HO incidence were assessed by computed tomography (CT) at week 12. Tissue edema was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound. Forty patients (aged 7-53 years) were enrolled (placebo: n = 10; palovarotene 5/2.5 mg: n = 9; palovarotene 10/5 mg: n = 21). Disease history was similar between groups. In the per-protocol population, the proportion of responders at week 6 by plain radiograph was 100% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 88.9% with placebo (Cochran-Armitage trend test: p = 0.17). At week 12, the proportions were 95.0% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 77.8% with placebo (Cochran-Armitage trend test: p = 0.15). Week 12 least-squares mean (LSmean) new HO volume, assessed by CT, was 3.8 x 10(3) mm(3) with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 1.3 x 10(3) mm(3) with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 18.0 x 10(3) mm(3) with placebo (pairwise tests versus placebo: p <= 0.12). Palovarotene was well-tolerated. No patients discontinued treatment or required dose reduction; one patient had dose interruption due to elevated lipase. Although these findings were not statistically significant, they support further evaluation of palovarotene for prevention of HO in FOP in larger studies. (c) 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available