4.3 Article

The risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 853-859

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00774-022-01355-1

Keywords

Bone mineral density; Distal radius fracture; Osteoporosis; Subsequent fracture

Funding

  1. Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, Republic of Korea [2020IT0001-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified older age, diabetes mellitus, previous fracture history, and low total hip BMD as significant risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture. Active glycemic control for diabetic patients and more aggressive treatment for those with low BMD may be necessary to prevent subsequent fractures.
Introduction The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture (DRF). Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with DRF who performed dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry within six months before or after the DRF and followed more than 12 months. We identified patients with subsequent fractures and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted with demographic information, underlying disease status, and bone fragility parameters at the time of DRF to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures. Results Subsequent fractures occurred in 56 patients (7.9% of 705 patients) with 65 fractures at a mean time of 33.5 months after DRF. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age (OR 1.032; 95% CI, 1.001-1.064, p = 0.044), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR 2.663; 95% CI, 1.429-4.963, p = 0.002) and previous fracture history (OR 1.917; 95% CI, 1.019-3.607, p = 0.043), and low total hip BMD (OR 1.410; 95% CI, 1.083-1.836, p = 0.011) were significant risk factors for the occurrence of subsequent fractures. Conclusion This study demonstrated that older age, DM, previous fracture history and low hip BMD are the risk factors for subsequent fractures after DRF. Active glycemic control would have a role in patients with DM and a more aggressive treat-to-target approach may be necessary for patients with low BMDs to prevent subsequent fractures after DRF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available