4.7 Article

Advances in SLE classification criteria

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Rheumatology

2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria domains at diagnosis: predictive factors of long-term damage in systemic lupus erythematosus

Carlos E. Insfran et al.

Summary: The 2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria played a role in predicting long-term damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly in predicting renal and neuropsychiatric damage. A cut-off >24 in 2019-EULAR/ACR score could predict a trend for renal damage with worse renal survival.

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY (2022)

Review Immunology

Assessing the EULAR/ACR classification criteria for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Martin Aringer et al.

Summary: External validation worldwide has confirmed the concepts and performance of the new EULAR/ACR SLE classification criteria. However, variation in specificity may be due to incomplete application of the attribution rule, while uncertainty and lack of consensus on disease entity boundaries also contribute to variation in estimates. Sensitivity relies heavily on the performance of ANA tests.

EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY (2022)

Article Rheumatology

Performance of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic Malaysian cohort

Shakira Selvananda et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE in a multi-ethnic Malaysian cohort and compared it against SLICC 2012 and ACR 1997 criteria. The EULAR/ACR criteria showed good sensitivity and specificity, with variations noted in early disease and among different ethnicities. The EULAR/ACR and SLICC 2012 demonstrated higher sensitivity than ACR 1997, while maintaining similar specificity overall and across different ethnic groups.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES (2022)

Article Rheumatology

Population-based incidence and time to classification of systemic lupus erythematosus by three different classification criteria: a Lupus Midwest Network (LUMEN) study

Ali Duarte-Garcia et al.

Summary: The study found that the incidence of SLE was higher when classified by the EULAR/ACR criteria compared to the ACR97 and SLICC criteria. The EULAR/ACR criteria also classified patients earlier than the ACR97 criteria, but similarly to the SLICC criteria.

RHEUMATOLOGY (2022)

Article Rheumatology

Efficacy of anifrolumab across organ domains in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from the TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials

Eric F. Morand et al.

Summary: This post-hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anifrolumab on organ domain-specific SLE disease activity. The results demonstrated that anifrolumab treatment improved multiple organ systems in SLE patients, particularly the musculoskeletal system, mucocutaneous system, and immunological system.

LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY (2022)

Article Rheumatology

Comparison of the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria With Two Sets of Earlier Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria

Michelle Petri et al.

Summary: This study compared the performance of weighted and unweighted SLICC criteria, as well as EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria in classifying systemic lupus erythematosus. Results showed that the weighted criteria and EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria had better specificity compared to the revised ACR 1997 and SLICC 2012 criteria. However, there were no significant differences in overall agreement with physician diagnosis among the different rules.

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2021)

Article Rheumatology

Applying the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Lupus Criteria to Patients From the LUMINA Cohort: Results From the Multiethnic, Multicenter US Cohort

Manuel F. Ugarte-Gil et al.

Summary: The 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria allow for earlier classification of a subset of SLE patients, with a small proportion classified earlier compared to the 1982/1997 ACR and 2012 SLICC criteria. Patients meeting the 2019 criteria earlier had lower disease activity and were less likely to have certain autoantibodies, while showing more specific disease manifestations.

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2021)

Article Rheumatology

Impact of the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Multicenter Cohort Study of 133 Women With Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease

Massimo Radin et al.

Summary: The study found that when applying the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria for SLE in a cohort of patients with UCTD, up to 17% of UCTD patients could be reclassified as having SLE. These patients had higher frequencies of mucocutaneous manifestations, arthritis, isolated urine abnormalities, and highly specific antibodies. At follow-up, they were more likely to meet the 1997 ACR revised SLE criteria and the SLICC criteria compared to other UCTD patients.

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2021)

Article Rheumatology

Performance of the New 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children and Young Adults

Najla Aljaberi et al.

Summary: The study compares the diagnostic usefulness of the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria to that of the 1997 ACR criteria in youths with SLE, showing that the 2019 criteria are significantly more sensitive while maintaining similar specificity.

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2021)

Article Rheumatology

New EULAR/ACR 2019 SLE Classification Criteria: defining ominosity in SLE

Laura P. Whittall Garcia et al.

Summary: A EULAR/ACR score of >= 20 is an indicator of disease severity in SLE, showing a more active disease course throughout the first 5 years following diagnosis.

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES (2021)

Article Rheumatology

The Performances of the ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, and EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Ezgi D. Batu et al.

Summary: This study aimed to test the performances of SLE classification criteria among pediatric patients, showing that SLICC 2012 had the best sensitivity, while ACR 1997 had the best specificity.

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY (2021)

Article Rheumatology

Applying SLICC and ACR/EULAR systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria in a cohort of patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease

Kyle R. Drehmel et al.

Summary: The study found that 14.0% to 20.2% of UCTD patients were reclassified as SLE when using the new SLE classification criteria. The reclassification trended towards statistical significance with McNemar's test. There was substantial agreement between the SLICC and ACR/EULAR criteria, suggesting potential clinical utility for these newer criteria in identifying more SLE patients.

LUPUS (2021)

Article Rheumatology

Integrative Analysis Reveals a Molecular Stratification of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases

Guillermo Barturen et al.

Summary: The study identified and validated four clusters, one healthy and three pathological, for systemic autoimmune diseases based on molecular patterns. Patients remained stable within their pathological clusters over time, with distinct molecular signatures characterizing each individual. This reclassification has significant implications for future clinical trials and understanding nonresponse to therapy, indicating a paradigm shift in the understanding of systemic autoimmune diseases.

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY (2021)

Article Rheumatology

European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification criteria item performance

Martin Aringer et al.

Summary: The study analyzed the performance of individual criteria items in the classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus, finding varying sensitivity among the specific items. By introducing a new entry criterion and attribution rule, the overall specificity of the criteria set was significantly improved.

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES (2021)

Article Rheumatology

The new 2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria specific domains at diagnosis can predict damage accrual in 670 childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients

Ana C. Pitta et al.

Summary: The 2019-EULAR/ACR criteria at diagnosis of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus are associated with higher rates of early damage accrual, especially renal and neuropsychiatric damage. Patients with renal or neuropsychiatric domains of the 2019-EULAR/ACR criteria at diagnosis were significantly associated with corresponding organ damage at the latest visit. Additionally, high disease activity at diagnosis and a 2019-EULAR/ACR score over 25 were also correlated with increased overall and renal damage.

LUPUS (2021)

Article Rheumatology

Performance of 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in a paediatric population-a multicentre study

Yoel Levinsky et al.

Summary: The study examined the application of the new EULAR/ACR-19 criteria in juvenile SLE patients and found that its sensitivity was high and specificity may have improved slightly compared with the SLICC-12 criteria. The study supports the use of the new classification criteria for pediatric patients in future jSLE studies, but notes that its specificity is lower than for adults.

RHEUMATOLOGY (2021)

Article Rheumatology

Limited sensitivity and specificity of the ACR/EULAR-2019 classification criteria for SLE in JSLE?-observations from the UK JSLE Cohort Study

Eve M. D. Smith et al.

Summary: The study tested the performance of new ACR and EULAR criteria in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus and found that they were not superior to the SLICC-2012 or ACR-1997 criteria. Variations in ANA positivity across ages were the main cause of significant differences between classification criteria.

RHEUMATOLOGY (2021)

Article Rheumatology

Avoiding misclassification of thrombotic primary antiphospholipid syndrome as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): What are the best-performing SLE classification criteria?

Flavio Signorelli et al.

Summary: The ACR/EULAR 2019 classification had a high accuracy for distinguishing PAPS from SLE, with a misclassification rate of 6.0%; whereas the SLICC 2012 incorrectly classified more than one third of the PAPS patients as having SLE, with a misclassification rate of 64.2%. The hematological domain was more predictive in the ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria, while the SLICC 2012 criteria were more likely to misclassify PAPS patients as SLE.

LUPUS (2021)

Article Pediatrics

Evaluating the performance of ACR, SLICC and EULAR/ACR classification criteria in childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus

Reem Abdwani et al.

Summary: This study aimed to compare the performance characteristics of three SLE classification criteria in childhood onset SLE cohort of Arab ethnicity from Oman. The results showed that the EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria had the highest sensitivity at initial presentation, first year and last assessment follow up, while the ACR-1997 criteria had the highest specificity at these time points. Further multinational studies are needed to validate the appropriate cut off score for the newly proposed ACR/EULAR 2019 classification criteria in cSLE.

PEDIATRIC RHEUMATOLOGY (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Assessment of EULAR/ACR-2019, SLICC-2012 and ACR-1997 Classification Criteria in SLE with Longstanding Disease

Berta Magallares et al.

Summary: In patients with longstanding SLE, the EULAR/ACR-2019 classification criteria demonstrated high sensitivity similar to SLICC-2012. Patients with serological, articular or renal involvement are more likely to meet the SLICC-2012 or EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2021)

Article Rheumatology

Associations Between Classification Criteria Items in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Zahi Touma et al.

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2020)

Review Immunology

Inflammatory markers in systemic lupus erythematosus

Martin Aringer

JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY (2020)

Review Dermatology

Cutaneous features and diagnosis of primary Sjogren syndrome: An update and review

Preeti Jhorar et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY (2018)

Article Rheumatology

Thrombosis and Anti-phospholipid Syndrome: a 5-Year Update on Treatment

Cecilia Beatrice Chighizola et al.

CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REPORTS (2018)

Review Rheumatology

Distinctions Between Diagnostic and Classification Criteria?

Rohit Aggarwal et al.

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2015)

Article Rheumatology

Mixed connective tissue disease: what is behind the curtain?

Martin Aringer et al.

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY (2007)

Review Rheumatology

Classification criteria in rheumatic diseases: A review of methodologic properties

Sindhu R. Johnson et al.

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2007)

Review Immunology

Anti-Ro/SSA and La/SSB antibodies

F Franceschini et al.

AUTOIMMUNITY (2005)