4.2 Article

Cost utility of vitamin D supplementation in adults with mild to moderate asthma

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASTHMA
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 951-959

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2110113

Keywords

Vitamin D; uncontrolled asthma; cost-effectiveness analysis; decision analysis; Markov model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the cost-utility of vitamin D supplementation in adults with mild to moderate persistent asthma in Colombia. The results showed that vitamin D supplementation was cost-effective, leading to improved quality of life and reduction in costs. This evidence should be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines.
Objective Uncontrolled asthma significantly impairs health-related quality of life and work productivity. Some add-on therapies, such as vitamin D supplements, safely reduce the rate of asthma exacerbation. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-utility of vitamin D supplementation in adults with mild to moderate persistent asthma in Colombia. Methods A Markov model was created to estimate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients with severe asthma in Colombia. Total costs and QALYs of two therapy strategies, vitamin D supplementation plus ICS versus ICS alone, were calculated over a one-year time horizon. Deterministic and probability sensitivity analyses were conducted, and cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay value of $5,180 per QALY gained. Results The base-case analysis showed that compared with no supplementation, vitamin D supplementation was associated with higher costs and higher QALYs. The expected annual cost per patient with vitamin D supplementation was US$1338 and without this supplementation it was US$1095. The QALYs per person estimated with vitamin D supplementation was 0.80, and without this supplementation it was 0.63. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was US$1583 per QALY. Conclusions Add-on vitamin D supplement was cost-effective when added to the usual care in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Our study provides evidence that should be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available