4.6 Article

Facile fabrication of thermoplastic polymer nanoparticles by combining sea-island spinning and Rayleigh instability

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 139, Issue 31, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.52728

Keywords

nanofibers; Rayleigh instability; sea-island spinning; nanospheres; ultrafine fibers

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U20A20257, 51803154]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2020CFB646]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study has successfully developed a method for large-scale manufacture of polymeric nanoparticles by combining industrial sea-island spinning technology and Rayleigh instability-induced morphology evolution.
Sea-island spinning has been widely used to prepare ultrafine fibers with diameters ranging from nanometers to micrometers in textile industry. However, the use of industrialized sea-island fibers as a precursor to fabricate polymeric nanoparticles has not been reported. Herein, the thermoplastic poly(vinyl alcohol-co-ethylene) (PVA-co-PE) nanofibers with similar to 240 nm were mass produced in an industrial production line, and the effect of thermal annealing on the morphological evolution was investigated. Rayleigh instability driven morphological transition from nanofibers to spherical particles in ethylene glycol system, demonstrating that the regular nanospheres could be fabricated by controlling annealing temperature and time. The PVA-co-PE nanoparticles with an average diameter of similar to 680 nm was obtained after annealing at 100 degrees C for 30 min. As a result, the PVA-co-PE nanoparticles can be mass-produced with 25 kg/day yield in our production line. This study opens a new avenue of research toward the large-scalable manufacture of polymeric micro/nano particles by combing industrialized sea-island spinning technology and Rayleigh instability-induced morphology evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available