4.6 Article

Manifold learning and segmentation for ultrasonic inspection of defects in polymer composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0087202

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [62022073, 61873241]
  2. Minister of Science and Technology, ROC [MOST 108-2221-E-007-068-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-destructive ultrasonic testing is important for monitoring the structural health of polymer composites. However, ultrasonic data often appear as noisy signals or images containing artifacts. To reduce human factors, this study proposes an unsupervised method, using nonlinear dimensionality reduction and semantic segmentation, to effectively detect subsurface defects in composite materials.
Non-destructive ultrasonic testing is beneficial for monitoring the structural health of polymer composites. However, owing to scattering and other factors, ultrasonic data often appear as noisy signals or images containing artifacts. The analysis of ultrasound signals highly depends on the expertise of trained human inspectors. Hence, the development of ultrasonic data analysis methods, particularly unsupervised methods, is necessitated. In this study, a novel unsupervised method is developed for the ultrasonic inspection of defects in polymer composites, named manifold learning and segmentation. In a uniform manifold approximation and projection model, nonlinear dimensionality reduction is first performed on high-dimensional ultrasound data for extracting and visualizing defect features. Subsequently, semantic segmentation is performed to predict/discriminate between defects and backgrounds. Consequently, subsurface defects in the composites can be effectively detected. Experimental results and comparisons on two carbon fiber reinforced polymer specimens demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available