4.3 Article

Determination of a reliable assessment for occupational eye lens dose in nuclear medicine

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13713

Keywords

dose equivalent; dosimeter location; eye lens; occupational exposure; radionuclide

Funding

  1. Japanese Society of Radiological Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the optimal dosimeter and method for measuring the amount of radiation exposure to the eye lens of nuclear medicine staff. The results showed that eye lens dosimeters providing a 3-mm dose equivalent near the eye would be a more reliable means of assessing radiation doses in the mixed radiation environment of nuclear medicine.
The most recent statement published by the International Commission on Radiological Protection describes a reduction in the maximum allowable occupational eye lens dose from 150 to 20 mSv/year (averaged over 5-year periods). Exposing the eye lens to radiation is a concern for nuclear medicine staff who handle radionuclide tracers with various levels of photon energy. This study aimed to define the optimal dosimeter and means of measuring the amount of exposure to which the eye lens is exposed during a routine nuclear medicine practice. A RANDO human phantom attached to Glass Badge and Luminess Badge for body or neck, DOSIRIS and VISION for eyes, and nanoDot for body, neck, and eyes was exposed to Tc-99m, I-123, and F-18 radionuclides. Sealed syringe sources of each radionuclide were positioned 30 cm from the abdomen of the phantom. Estimated exposure based on measurement conditions (i.e., air kerma rate constants, conversion coefficient, distance, activity, and exposure time) was compared measured dose equivalent of each dosimeter. Differences in body, neck, and eye lens dosimeters were statistically analyzed. The 10-mm dose equivalent significantly differed between the Glass Badge and Luminess Badge for the neck, but these were almost equivalent at the body. The 0.07-mm dose equivalent for the nanoDot dosimeters was greatly overestimated compared to the estimated exposure of Tc-99m and I-123 radionuclides. Measured dose equivalents of exposure significantly differed between the body and eye lens dosimeters with respect to F-18. Although accurately measuring radiation exposure to the eye lenses of nuclear medicine staff is conventionally monitored using dosimeters worn on the chest or abdomen, eye lens dosimeters that provide a 3-mm dose equivalent near the eye would be a more reliable means of assessing radiation doses in the mixed radiation environment of nuclear medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available