4.7 Article

Activity of cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam against ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 77, Issue 10, Pages 2809-2815

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac241

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [PI17/01482, PI20/01212, PI21/00017, PI18/00501, PI21/00704]
  2. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (Instituto de Salud Carlos III, ISCIII)
  3. Spanish Network of Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI) [RD16/0016/0004, RD16/0016/0006]
  4. ISCIII-General Subdirection of Assessment and Promotion of the Research-European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) 'A way of making Europe'
  5. GAIN (Agencia Gallega de Innovacion, Conselleria de Economia, Emprego e Industria) [IN607D2021/12, IN607A 2016/22]
  6. Rio Hortega programme (ISCIII) [CM21/00007, CM21/00076]
  7. ISCIII project [FI18/00315]
  8. Juan Rodes programme (ISCIII) [JR21/00026]
  9. Miguel Servet II programme [CPII18/00024]
  10. [IN606A-2019/029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the activity of new drugs against ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Cefiderocol and cefepime/taniborbactam were the most active agents. However, resistance was observed in some strains with specific mutations or overexpression of efflux pumps.
Objectives To evaluate the activity of cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam against a clinical and laboratory collection of ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa beta-lactamase mutants. Methods The activity of cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam and comparators was evaluated against a collection of 30 molecularly characterized ceftolozane/tazobactam- and/or ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from patients previously treated with cephalosporins. To evaluate how the different beta-lactamases in the clinical isolates affected the resistance to these agents, a copy of each bla(PDC), bla(OXA-2) and bla(OXA-10) ancestral and mutant allele from the clinical isolates was cloned in pUCp24 and expressed in dual bla(PDC)-oprD (for bla(PDC)-like genes) or single oprD (for bla(OXA-2)-like and bla(OXA-10)-like genes) PAO1 knockout mutants. MICs were determined using reference methodologies. Results For all isolates, MICs were higher than 4 and/or 8 mg/L for ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam, respectively. Cefiderocol was the most active agent, showing activity against all isolates, except one clinical isolate that carried an R504C substitution in PBP3 (MIC = 16 mg/L). Imipenem/relebactam was highly active against all isolates, except two clinical isolates that carried the VIM-20 carbapenemase. Cefepime/zidebactam and cefepime/taniborbactam displayed activity against most of the isolates, but resistance was observed in some strains with PBP3 amino acid substitutions or that overexpressed mexAB-oprM or mexXY efflux pumps. Evaluation of transformants revealed that OXA-2 and OXA-10 extended-spectrum variants cause a 2-fold increase in the MIC of cefiderocol relative to parental enzymes. Conclusions Cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam show promising and complementary in vitro activity against ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant P. aeruginosa. These agents may represent potential therapeutic options for ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant P. aeruginosa infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available