4.5 Article

Primary and Secondary Care Related Quality Indicators for Dementia Care Among Australian Aged Care Users: National Trends, Risk Factors, and Variation

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 1511-1522

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-220336

Keywords

Dementia; health care; health services for the aged; primary health care; quality indicators; secondary care

Categories

Funding

  1. Registry of Senior Australians' (ROSA) Steering Committee
  2. ROSA South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI) Research Team
  3. South Australian Government Department for Innovation and Skills
  4. Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund [PHRDI000009]
  5. South Australian Government Premier's Research and Industry Fund
  6. Australian Dementia Network (ADNeT) [National Health and Medical Research Council Boosting Dementia Research Grants] [GNT1152623]
  7. Hospital Research Foundation Mid-Career Fellowship
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Grant [GNT119378]
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship [GNT1156439]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of primary and secondary care clinical quality indicators (CQIs) for Australians with dementia using government subsidized aged care. The results showed an increase in incidence of all CQIs except for medication reviews. Being female, older, having fewer comorbidities, and living outside a major city were associated with lower likelihood of using the services.
Background: Studies related to clinical quality indicators (CQIs) in dementia have focused on hospitalizations, medication management, and safety. Less attention has been paid to indicators related to primary and secondary care. Objective: To evaluate the incidence of primary and secondary care CQIs for Australians with dementia using government subsidized aged care. The examined CQIs were: comprehensive medication reviews, 75+ health assessments, comprehensive geriatric assessments, chronic disease management plans, general practitioner (GP) mental health treatment plans, and psychiatrist attendances. Methods: Retrospective cohort study (2011-2016) of 255,458 individuals. National trend analyses estimated incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Poisson or negative binomial regression. Associations were assessed using backward stepwise multivariate Poisson or negative binomial regression model, as appropriate. Funnel plots examined geographic and permanent residential aged care (PRAC) facility variation. Results: CQI incidence increased in all CQIs but medication reviews. For the overall cohort, 75+ health assessments increased from 1.07/1000 person-days to 1.16/1000 person-days (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) = 1.03, 95%CI 1.02-1.03).Comprehensive geriatric assessments increased from 0.24 to 0.37/1000 person-days (aIRR = 1.12, 95%CI 1.10-1.14). GP mental health treatment plans increased from 0.04 to 0.07/1000 person-days (aIRR = 1.13, 95%CI 1.12-1.15). Psychiatric attendances increased from 0.09 to 0.11/1000 person-days (aIRR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.03-1.07). Being female, older, having fewer comorbidities, and living outside a major city were associated with lower likelihood of using the services. Large geographical and PRAC facility variation was observed (0-92%). Conclusion: Better use of primary and secondary care services to address needs of individuals with dementia is urgently needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available