4.7 Article

Comparison between atmospheric-pressure-plasma-jet-processed and furnace-calcined rGO-MnOx nanocomposite electrodes for gel-electrolyte supercapacitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 911, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165006

Keywords

Atmospheric-pressure plasma; Manganese oxide; Reduced graphene oxide; Supercapacitor; Rapid calcination

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education [110L9006]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [MOST 108-2221-E-002-088-MY3, MOST 110-2634-F-002-043]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 110-3116-F-002-0 02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, rGO-Mn(NO3)2·4H2O was converted into rGO-MnOx using nitrogen atmospheric-pressure plasma jet (APPJ) and/or tube furnace. The SCs processed by APPJ showed better performance compared to furnace-processed ones. Additionally, the rGO-MnOx SC outperformed the previously reported rGO-SnOx SC.
Reduced graphene oxide (rGO)-Mn(NO3)(2)center dot 4H(2)O pastes were screen-printed on a carbon cloth substrate and then calcined using a nitrogen atmospheric-pressure-plasma-jet (APPJ) and/or tube furnace to convert it into rGO-MnOx. The rGO-MnO(x)electrodes were then used in a PVA/H2SO4 gel-electrolyte supercapacitor (SC). The SCs were characterized by cycle voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charging/discharging (GCD). The results reveal better performance of the APPJ-processed SCs in comparison with furnace-processed ones under the same processing temperature, possibly owing to the synergetic effect of heat and reactive nitrogen plasma species. The rGO-MnOx SC is also superior to the rGO-SnOx SC reported in our previous study processed under similar APPJ processing. The rGO-MnOx SC processed by APPJ at 620 degrees C for 8 min exhibits the best areal capacitance of 57.01 mF/cm(2) as evaluated by GCD with a capacitance retention rate of 84.41% after a 10,000-cycle CV test. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available