4.7 Article

Li10Sn0.95P2S11.9-xOx: A new sulfide solid electrolyte for all-solid-state batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 926, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166731

Keywords

Sulfide electrolyte; O-doped; Ionic conductivity; Li10SnP2S12

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21865032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the doping of oxygen in Li10SnP2S12 electrolyte using solid-phase sintering method to improve the ionic conductivity and stability to lithium and air. The doped electrolyte shows enhanced conductivity, improved stability, and good cycling performance in all-solid-state batteries.
All-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) have high safety and high energy density. Li10SnP2S12 sulfide solid electrolyte has attracted extensive attention due to its low fabrication cost and outstanding performance in ASSBs. However, its ionic conductivity and stability to lithium and air need to be further improved. Here, in order to avoid the formation of impurities related to Sn-related compounds, the content of SnS2 in the raw materials is reduced, and to improve ionic conductivity and stability to lithium and air. The S site is doped with O by the solid-phase sintering method, and a series of Li10Sn0.95P2S11.9-xOx (0 <= x <= 1) electrolytes are prepared. Li10Sn0.95P2S11.4O0.5 (LS0.95PSO0.5) has a high ionic conductivity of 3.96 mS cm(-1) and low activation energy after cold pressing. According to the Hard-Soft-Acid-Base theory, doping O into the electrolyte in advance will improve the stability. The ionic conductivity decay of LS0.95PSO0.5 after exposure to air is smaller, which proves that O doping improves the air stability of the electrolyte. LS0.95PSO0.5 also shows good stability to lithium. The assembled LNO@LCO/LS0.95PSO0.5/Li-In ASSB exhibits a high first-cycle discharge capacity of 133 mA h g(-1) and good cycling stability. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available