4.7 Article

Cross-trial prediction of depression remission using problem-solving therapy: A machine learning approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages 89-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.015

Keywords

Prediction models; Machine learning; Problem-solving therapy; Clinical trials; Precision medicine

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [UH2HL132368, UH3HL132368, R01HL119453]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using machine learning algorithms, it is possible to predict depression remission for patients undergoing PST treatment, with key predictors including sex, sleep disturbance, sleep-related impairment, and negative problem orientation. The models showed accuracy significantly greater than chance in predicting remission at baseline and 2-months, offering opportunities for personalized early treatment optimization.
Background: Psychotherapy is a standard depression treatment; however, determining a patient's prognosis with therapy relies on clinical judgment that is subject to trial-and-error and provider variability. Purpose: To develop machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict depression remission for patients undergoing 6 months of problem-solving therapy (PST). Method: Using data from the treatment arm of 2 randomized trials, ML models were trained and validated on ENGAGE-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov, #NCT03841682) and tested on RAINBOW (ClinicalTrials.gov, #NCT02246413) for predictions at baseline and at 2-months. Primary outcome was depression remission using the Depression Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) score < 0.5 at 6 months. Predictor variables included baseline characteristics (sociodemographic, behavioral, clinical, psychosocial) and intervention engagement through 2-months. Results: Of the 26 candidate variables, 8 for baseline and 11 for 2-months were predictive of depression remission, and used to train the models. The best-performing model predicted remission with an accuracy significantly greater than chance in internal validation using the ENGAGE-2 cohort, at baseline [72.6% (SD = 3.6%), p < 0.0001] and at 2-months [72.3% (5.1%), p < 0.0001], and in external validation with the RAINBOW cohort at baseline [58.3% (0%), p < 0.0001] and at 2-months [62.3% (0%), p < 0.0001]. Model-agnostic explanations highlighted key predictors of depression remission at the cohort and patient levels, including female sex, lower self-reported sleep disturbance, lower sleep-related impairment, and lower negative problem orientation. Conclusions: ML models using clinical and patient-reported data can predict depression remission for patients undergoing PST, affording opportunities for prospective identification of likely responders, and for developing personalized early treatment optimization along the patient care trajectory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available