Journal
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages 391-397Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.009
Keywords
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS); Rasch analysis; Postnatal depression; Assessment; Reliability; Psychometrics
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this study, the Rasch methodology was used to examine and enhance the psychometric properties of the EPDS. The results showed that the EPDS met the expectations of the unidimensional Rasch model after internal modifications. The use of ordinal-to-interval conversion tables derived from the Rasch model can improve the precision of the EPDS.
Background: The 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a widely used depression measure with acceptable psychometric properties, but it uses ordinal scaling that has limited precision for assessment of outcomes in clinical and research settings. This study aimed to apply Rasch methodology to examine and enhance psychometric properties of the EPDS by developing ordinal-to-interval conversion algorithm. Methods: The Partial Credit Rasch model was implemented using a sample of 621 mothers of infants (birth to 2 years old) who completed the EPDS as a part of a larger online survey. Results: Initial analysis indicated misfit to the Rasch model attributed to local dependency between individual EPDS items. The best model fit was achieved after combining six locally dependent items into three super-items resulting in non-significant item-trait interaction (chi 2(49) = 46.61, p < 0.57), strong reliability (PSI = 0.86), unidimensionality and item invariance across personal factors such as age and mothers' education. This permitted generation of ordinal-to-interval conversion algorithms derived from person estimates of the Rasch model. Limitations: Ordinal-to-interval conversion cannot be applied for individuals with missing data. Conclusions: The EPDS met expectations of the unidimensional Rasch model after internal modifications, and its precision can be enhanced by using ordinal-to-interval conversion tables published in this article without the need to alter the original scale format. Scores derived from these conversion tables should decrease error and improve conformity with statistical assumptions in both clinical and research use of the EPDS, making monitoring of clinical status and outcomes more accurate.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available