4.7 Review

Effectiveness and acceptability of non-pharmacological interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: Overview of systematic reviews and network meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 311, Issue -, Pages 383-390

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.05.043

Keywords

Overview of systematic review; Network meta-analysis; Non-pharmacological intervention

Funding

  1. Central South University Innovation-driven project [2021zzts0337]
  2. Chinese Scholarship Council [202006360116]
  3. Con-struction of Innovative Provinces in Hunan [2020SK2055]
  4. Special Funding for the Construction of Innovative Provinces in Hunan
  5. National Key RAMP
  6. D Program of China [2020YFC2008603, 2020YFC2008602]
  7. China Oceanwide Holdings Group Project Fund [143010100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effectiveness and acceptability of non-pharmacological interventions in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using systematic reviews and network meta-analysis. The findings suggest that physical activity, cognitive interventions, and multicomponent interventions can significantly improve cognitive function in individuals with MCI.
Background: To explore effectiveness and acceptability of non-pharmacological interventions in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: Overview of systematic reviews and network meta-analysis were conducted. Systematic reviews (SRs) were searched via seven databases from June 2015 to June 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved. The Methodological quality was assessed by AMSTAR 2 and RoB 2. Outcomes were effectiveness and acceptability measured by standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Pairwise meta-analysis was first conducted, followed by network meta-analysis. Results: A total of 22 SRs and 42 RCTs with 4401 participants were included. The methodological quality of included SRs and RCTs were moderate. There were four interventions, with three types of physical activity (aerobic, muscle-strengthening, and mind-body), three types of cognitive (rehearsal-based, compensatory, and mixed), multicomponent (physical and cognitive component), and nutrition intervention. No significant inconsistency was identified. Regarding intervention effectiveness, muscle-strengthening (SMDs 0.87, 95% CI 0.31-1.43; rank 1), mind-body (0.76, 0.38-1.14; rank 2) and aerobic (0.34, 0.13-0.50; rank 3) were significantly better than the control group and there was no significant difference among these types of intervention . Cognitive intervention of rehearsal-based (1.33, 0.30-2.35; rank 1) and mixed (0.55, 0.00-1.11; rank 2) were significantly better than the control group and there was no significant difference among these types of intervention. Multicomponent intervention (0.32, 0.02-0.62) were significantly better than the control group but not better than the single component group. Regarding acceptability, there was no significant difference among types of intervention. Conclusion: Physical activity, cognitive, and multicomponent intervention could be provided regardless of their types and acceptability due to their effectiveness on improved cognitive function for people with MCI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available