4.5 Article

Experimental Investigations of Screech Mitigation and Amplification by Beveled and Double-Beveled Nozzles

Journal

JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001447

Keywords

Supersonic jet noise; Shock noise; Screech; Acoustic measurements; Lip-modified nozzle

Funding

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education AcRF Tier-2 Grant [MOE2014-T2-1-002]
  2. School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the effects of beveled and double-beveled circular nozzles on supersonic jet screech and finds that beveled nozzles can eliminate screech while double-beveled nozzles amplify it, producing highly unstable screech.
An experimental study was conducted to investigate and compare the effects of beveled and double-beveled circular nozzles on supersonic jet screech at a nozzle pressure ratio of 5. In particular, near- and far-field microphone measurements and schlieren visualizations were utilized to look into selected acoustic and flow features associated with jet screech radiation. Results show that beveled nozzles eliminate jet screech by producing asymmetric shock structures and instability waves that are mismatched in phase and amplitude. In contrast, double-beveled nozzles produce symmetric shock structures and amplify screech intensity, even when jet mixing effects have been significantly enhanced. It is further observed that amplified jet screeches produced by double-beveled nozzles are highly unsteady and undergo nonperiodic and stochastic temporal variations. Last but not least, double-beveled nozzles also significantly impact screech peak noise locations and confer different changes along different measurement planes. The present study demonstrates that not all beveled-type nozzles are able to mitigate jet screech, with nonoptimal designs amplifying it instead.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available